Call for Chapters: Book — “Documentation of/as Violence” by Liu & Liu

Overview:

We are soliciting chapter proposals for an edited volume titled “Documentation of/as Violence.” In this volume, we seek to explore how documentation, or the lack thereof, can function in capacities that both enforce and protect against violence. We understand documents, and documentation, through two primary functions: surveillance and preservation. The collection of materials capturing violence enacted upon marginalized communities, as well as how the practice of documentation itself can be a violent action of surveillance experienced by marginalized communities complicate the function of representation in library and archival collections.

Throughout this volume, our goal is to encourage readers to reflect on the role(s) of violence in the preservation of history. We seek to map out a range of perspectives that critically engage with how professional practice addresses the documentation of violence, as well as how documentation itself enacts violence on marginalized communities. We welcome contributors writing from critical theoretical, Black, feminist, abolitionist, Indigenous, post-colonial, and liberatory perspectives, as well as contributors working outside of libraries and archives (such as community organizers and activists, and public historians).

Proposal Submission Deadline:

February 18, 2026

Sample topics:

Examples of topics include, but are not limited to:

Documentation and Surveillance Technologies

• Histories of the surveillance of marginalized communities

• Documentation of activism and activist groups

• Absence of documentation as protection (e.g., public libraries)

• Impact of technology/technological developments on documentation and ethics

• Access to and engagement with documentation of violence

Ethical Quandaries

• Agency and consent of the subject of documentation

• Who is entitled to documentation of a community?

• What is the value of documentation of violence?

• Preservation of documentation of violence

• Impact of one’s identity and positionality relative to the content of documentation

What is the value of documentation?

• Differences in the function of documentation for institutions and communities

• Gaps in documentation

• Archival silence

• Does loss of documentation equal violence against a community / history?

Proposal Guidelines:

Proposals should follow the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition (APA-7).

Proposals should include:

• Primary author’s name, email address, position title, and institutional affiliation

• Co-authors’ names, email addresses, titles, and affiliations

• Brief author(s) biography (100 words maximum per author)

• Proposed chapter title

• A 300-500 word chapter proposal

Submit proposals via Google forms at https://forms.gle/Tb8hNu2WEQBmig6o6

Communications from the editors will be going to primary authors.

Proposal submission and timelines:

• Proposals for chapters due to editors: February 18, 2026

• Notification by editors of proposal acceptance: Late April

• Authors submit completed chapters: Mid-November 2026

• Anticipated publication is 2027 or 2028

• Additional key dates will be sent to successful proposal authors

Email questions to:

1. Tina Liu, Cataloguing Librarian, tina.liu@mcgill.ca

2. Tellina Liu, Archivist and Liaison Librarian, tellina.liu@mcgill.ca

Call for Submissions: Nontheatrical Student Essay Award, Celebrating student work in The Moving Image

In collaboration with AMIA, the SCMS Nontheatrical Film and Media SIG is delighted to announce its third Nontheatrical Student Essay Award.

Designed to recognize outstanding graduate student scholarship founded upon archival nontheatrical research, this award underscores both organizations’ commitment to mentorship and professional development, connecting award-recipients with mentors to guide them through the process of crafting journal-ready manuscripts. The award-winning essay will also be published (subject to revisions) in The Moving Image.

Our second award went to Miao Wang (University of Chicago), for his paper ‘Formatting Chinese Cinema: Small-Gauge Projectors in the Socialist Era.’ Keep your eyes peeled for its publication in The Moving Image!

In 2025, we also introduced an Honorable Mention. It was received by: Gonçalo Albergaria (Utrecht University) for his paper ‘Geoscientific film in the 1957/58 Capelinhos eruption: Raquel Soeiro de Brito and the moving image as epistemic tool.’

Eligibility

Applicants must be enrolled in a recognized graduate program at the time of entry.

Submission Criteria

  • The winning scholarly essay will demonstrate original and critical analysis, clarity of argument and exposition, and engagement with varied source materials related to the study of nontheatrical media (e.g. science film, educational film, home movies, government films, etc.)
  • Students may submit their own paper, or they may be nominated by an advisor or professor with the author’s consent. In either case, the submitter should provide a short author’s CV.
  • Papers shall be submitted in English and may not have been published in part or in whole by the time of submission. The manuscript should be 4000-6000 words in length (double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 pt, with 1-inch margins, using the Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition), including footnotes/endnotes but excluding bibliography.
  • Before the first-place essay is published in The Moving Image, its author will work with a faculty mentor and The Moving Image editors to revise the essay for publication, in keeping with the developmental editing procedures of the journal.
  • Submissions will be evaluated by the governing body of the Nontheatrical Film and Media SIG and editors from The Moving Image.

Submissions will be due February 15, 2026 and can be sent to nontheatricalessayaward@gmail.com. The author of the winning paper will be contacted in early March 2026, and announced at the 2026 SCMS Annual Conference.

Point of contact for questions about the award and the submission process: Sophia Gräfe, Co-Chair of the SCMS Nontheatrical Film and Media SIG: sophia.graefe@hu-berlin.de.

Download the Call for Submissions here.

The Moving Image is the journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA). It explores topics relevant to both the media archivist and the media scholar. The Moving Image deals with crucial issues surrounding the preservation, archiving, and restoration of film, video, and digital moving images. It features detailed profiles of moving image collections; interpretive and historical essays about archival materials; articles on archival description, appraisal, and access; behind-the-scenes looks at the techniques used to preserve, restore, and digitize moving images; and theoretical articles on the future of the field. More here.

The Nontheatrical Film & Media Scholarly Interest Group (SIG) of the Society of Cinema and Media Studies (SCMS) provides a setting for scholars working in this area to collaborate, share research tips, and debate methodological issues. Moreover, this SIG acts as another connection between the academic and archival worlds, and between other SIGs and committees within SCMS, such as the Media Archives Committee. The mission of the Nontheatrical Film & Media Scholarly Interest Group is to facilitate discussion, consolidation, outreach, and inclusion. More here.

CLIR 2026 Call for Proposals, “Pocket Burgundy” Series

2026 Call for Proposals, “Pocket Burgundy” Series

Deadline for Proposals: March 24, 2026

January 14, 2026 – The Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) invites proposals for its “Pocket Burgundy” series. Prospective authors and writing teams can propose ideas for reports relevant to the information and cultural heritage communities. Selected authors and teams will be offered a stipend of $3,000 for each publication. The deadline for submissions is March 24, 2026. Decisions will be announced in late May.

CLIR encourages submissions on any topic affecting information or cultural heritage work anywhere in the world. Prospective authors are encouraged to propose projects that would benefit libraries, archives, museums, and the communities they serve.

Publications will be released in electronic form under a Creative Commons license and will be openly accessible, free of charge.

Applicants are encouraged to read through the full call for proposals, the program FAQs and to review previous Pocket Burgundy publications prior to submitting their proposals. Instructions for submitting a proposal are linked from the program web page. Questions about this opportunity or the application process should be directed to Christa Williford (cwilliford@clir.org).

CFP: Studies in Oral History (Australia)

Contributions for the peer review and reports sections of the 2026 issue of our journal Studies in Oral History are now being accepted. The deadline for submission of peer review articles is 31 March 2026 and for reports it is 29 May 2026.

This is the first issue to be produced by our new editors Mia Martin Hobbs and Geraldine Fela. It’s theme is ‘Bearing Witness, Making Histories’.

For further information including word limits and how to submit your article, go to the Call for Papers, Issue 48, 2026.

Contributors are advised to review the following before submission:

About the theme

We are living through a time of relentless violence, towards human beings, our social world, and to our environment. What then does it mean, as historians, to bear witness and make history? 
As oral historians, we are used to the role of witness. The creation of an oral history archive is a kind of witness bearing. In the interview we watch and listen in real time as life stories unfold, with all their attendant pain, joy, complications and moments of discomposure. To bear witness in this setting often means something profoundly intimate, but bearing witness can also speak to a broader political and responsibility: to bear witness can mean to speak or record a truth, or to gather collectively to remember, commemorate or protest.

The post Call for Papers – Journal 2026 appeared first on Oral History Australia.

CFP: Special Issues on GenAI Tools within Libraries, Archives and Museums – Information Technology and Libraries #ITAL

Guest editors Ellen Schmid and Katy Miller invite you to submit a proposal for an article in an upcoming special issue of Information Technology and Libraries that will explore the integration of Generative AI tools within library, archive, and museum research environments. This special issue will be published in September 2026. We welcome contributions that provide practical insights, case studies, or user research on the development, deployment, and impact of AI-enhanced research tools. Topics of interest include user-focused interfaces, implementation processes, UX assessments, and the influence of GenAI on workflows, data analysis, and research practices. Articles should present first-hand experience with designing, testing, or evaluating AI helpers, and may cover commercial or open-source solutions. 

Submissions of up to 5,000 words will be accepted for a publication target of September 2026. 

Article proposals are due February 1, 2026 and include a 500-word abstract and a brief statement about the author’s experience in the field. Authors will be notified of acceptance in late February, with a submission of the first draft of the article (no more than 5,000 words) due May 1, 2026. Articles will go through the same rigorous peer review, copyediting, and proofreading process as any other ITAL article.

This issue will be guest edited by Ellen Schmid and Katy Miller in collaboration with ITAL’s Editor (Ken Varnum) and Assistant Editor (Joanna DiPasquale). 

Submit your proposal: https://forms.gle/aSjdjpvoR2QG4By87

Email questions to: 

CfA: History – Theory – Criticism Journal 2/2026: The AI Turn in Contemporary Historiography: Challenges, Applications, Reflections

Call for Articles

Special Issue 2/2026

The AI Turn in Contemporary Historiography: Challenges, Applications, Reflections

Deadline for submissions: 30 June 2026

Scope and Aims

Artificial intelligence has entered the field of historiography not as a neutral instrument but as a phenomenon that unsettles its very foundations. The capacity of large language models to generate and reorganize knowledge on a scale that surpasses human comprehension compels historians to reconsider the principles that have long defined their craft: authorship, interpretation, verification, and the human mediation of evidence. The accelerating automation of textual production introduces a cognitive threshold that challenges the historian’s ability to control, evaluate, and verify the narratives emerging from algorithmic systems. 

This transformation reveals both the potential and the vulnerability of historical knowledge. Artificial intelligence enables new ways of analyzing extensive textual corpora, translating and connecting sources, and recognizing patterns across linguistic and temporal boundaries. At the same time, it alters the conditions under which meaning is produced and received, eroding the distinction between human interpretation and computational synthesis. The opacity of large models, concealed in their training data and hierarchies of value, complicates one of the historian’s central tasks: the capacity to identify, understand, and critique bias within sources. 

The AI turn in historiography, therefore, marks more than a technical or methodological innovation. It signifies a shift in the scale and ecology of knowledge, shaped by the asymmetries of global computational power and by growing dependence on corporate infrastructures. This situation calls for reflection on how historical inquiry can preserve its ethical and interpretive integrity while adapting to an environment governed by automation, data abundance, and limited transparency.

This special issue of History – Theory – Criticism invites contributions that address these challenges. We seek studies and reflections that examine how artificial intelligence transforms the epistemology, methodology, and ethics of historical work, how historians can critically engage with opaque algorithmic systems, and how humanistic scholarship re-articulates alternative, locally grounded, and sustainable approaches to technological innovation. 

Themes and questions

1. Epistemology, authorship, and interpretation 

a) How does the massive production of synthetic text alter the relationship between information and interpretation? Can historians still claim control over the evidentiary process when relying on systems whose reasoning and corpus remain opaque? 

b) To what extent can AI be said to “understand” the past, and how does its pattern-based synthesis differ from human interpretation? 

c) What frameworks of transparency, citation, and disclosure are needed to ensure accountability in AI-assisted research and writing? 

d) How might the concept of authorship evolve when historical texts are increasingly co-produced by human and machine intelligence? 

2. Methodology, infrastructure, and the Black box 

a) General-purpose models reproduce values, hierarchies, and linguistic biases embedded in their training data, often without the user’s awareness. This deepens the “black box” problem and undermines one of the foundations of historical scholarship—the capacity to identify and critique bias in sources. 

b) How can historians engage critically with these systems without surrendering epistemic agency? 

c) What role might smaller, domain-specific, and ethically curated models play in building more transparent and interpretable infrastructures for historical research? 

d) How can collaboration between historians, computer scientists, and archivists foster local, open, and sustainable alternatives to corporate AI ecosystems? 

3. Cognitive, political, and environmental boundaries 

a) The automation of interpretation introduces a cognitive threshold: the scale of machine-generated material now exceeds what human scholars can meaningfully read or evaluate. This raises the question of how knowledge is curated, filtered, and trusted in a post-verificatory environment. 

b) At the same time, the concentration of computational resources in a few global centers reinforces inequalities between academic communities and widens the gap between those who design AI and those who merely consume it.

c) Finally, the environmental and energy costs of large-scale AI infrastructures compel the humanities to consider the ecological ethics of technological progress. What forms of scholarship might align critical inquiry with sustainability and local autonomy? 

4. Education, practice, and the future of humanistic knowledge 

a) How can historical education cultivate critical AI literacy rather than simple tool proficiency? 

b) What pedagogical strategies can help students and researchers maintain interpretive depth and ethical reflection in an environment saturated by generative systems?

c) Should AI be understood as an auxiliary method, a paradigm shift, or a mirror revealing the epistemological foundations of humanistic knowledge itself? 

d) How can universities and professional organizations shape guidelines that safeguard integrity and creativity while embracing innovation? 

Submission guidelines

Submissions and inquiries should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief via email. 

Language: English 

Text length: articles 36–72,000 characters including notes; discussion papers 18–36,000 characters; reviews 9–18,000 characters. All articles should include an abstract (150–200 words) and 4–5 keywords. 

Format: Microsoft Word (*.docx) or Libre Office (*.odt), following the DTK Manual of Style and Ethical Code 

Peer review: Double-blind by two independent reviewers 

Deadline: 30 June 2026 

Publication: Winter 2026, Diamond Open Access 

Guest Editors: Jaromír Mrňka, Jiří Hlaváček

About the journal

Dějiny – teorie – kritika (History – theory – criticism) is a peer-reviewed, Diamond open-access journal, founded in 2004 and published by the Faculty of Humanities at Charles University. Indexed in SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS, EBSCOhost, CEEOL, and DOAJ, the journal provides a platform for theoretically grounded and methodologically innovative approaches to the past. 

Contact Information

Petr Wohlmuth, Ph.D. (Editor-in-Chief): Petr.Wohlmuth@fhs.cuni.cz

Journal website: https://ojs.cuni.cz/dejinyteoriekritika

Contact Email

Petr.Wohlmuth@fhs.cuni.cz

URL

https://ojs.cuni.cz/dejinyteoriekritika

CFP: Translating Ruins: Mutable Grounds, Mediated Encounters, and Mobile Precarities

We are delighted to invite scholars from all disciplines to contribute to the forthcoming edited volume with Routledge: Translating Ruins: Mutable Grounds, Mediated Encounters, and Mobile Precarities. 

In an era of climate crisis, extractivism, war, forced displacement, migration, and rapid urban change, ruins have become pervasive. Contemporary ruin scholarship has moved beyond the aesthetic of Ruinenlust (‘ruin lust’) to recognise ruins as critical thresholds that illuminate entanglements of pasts, presents, and futures (López Galviz et al., 2017). This edited volume examines how translational practices – broadly conceived as complex semiotic practices that are materially grounded and embedded in sociohistorical, ethical and creative relations – engage with historical and contemporary ruins, and how such practices shape the reconstruction, reinterpretation, remembrance and governance of contested ruin-sites, wider processes of ruination, and forms of ruin-related heritage.

We invite critical and practice-based contributions that engage with the complexities of translating ruins. We especially welcome proposals from Translation Studies, Critical Heritage Studies, Postcolonial Studies, Memory Studies, Urban Studies, Cultural Geography, Art History and Visual Culture, and related fields.

Topics may include, but are not limited to:  

  • The transformation of ruins into museums, monuments, heritage sites, and immersive multimedia formats. 
  • The redevelopment or repurposing of ruins into green spaces, public facilities, cultural infrastructures, or commercial complexes – spaces that may themselves enter new cycles of decay and renewal.  
  • Multilingual and multimodal interpreting and translation practices within ruin-related museums, heritage sites, communities, or institutional settings.  
  • Activist or community-based translation practices, or artistic interventions in sites of historical or ongoing ruination.  
  • Intermedial and multimodal representations and translations of ruins and ruin narratives across diverse platforms and formats, including social media, blogs, travel vlogs, livestreams, and digital archives.  
  • The translation and resignification of ruin-related textual fragments, archival materials, photographs, and other material remnants. 
  • The translation of narratives that foreground the material presence and historical specificity of ruins, and the lived experience of those who built, inhabited, or survived ruins. 
  • The transposition of ruin objects to new sites and interpretive contexts (e.g., travelling exhibitions, diasporic archives).   

Submission details:

Please submit a proposal of up to 300 words as a single Word document (.doc or .docx) to translatingruins@gmail.com with the subject line: “[Your Name] – Chapter Proposal”. 

The Word document should include: 

  • A provisional chapter title 
  • An abstract (maximum 300 words, excluding references) and up to five keywords 
  • A short biographical note (maximum 150 words), including your affiliation and contact details
  • A brief statement indicating whether the proposed chapter will include any line illustrations, photographs, or tables, and whether colour reproduction will be required

The deadline for abstract submission is 23 February 2026. Full chapters are due 30 September 2026.

Contact Information

Yaqi Xi (yaqi.xi@warwick.ac.uk), University of Warwick, UK.

Shaoyu Yang (shaoyu.yang@warwick.ac.uk), University of Warwick, UK.

Contact Email

translatingruins@gmail.com

Attachments

CfP_Translating Ruins

CFP: “Sound Recordings” – Journal Sources. Materials & Fieldwork in African Studies

We are pleased to announce a call for papers (in French, English, and Portuguese) for a special issue on the theme: “Sound recordings,” coordinated by Charlotte Grabli (CNRS, Centre d’histoire sociale des mondes contemporains) and Aïssatou Mbodj-Pouye (CNRS, Institut des mondes africains), to be published in the journal Sources. Materials & Fieldwork in African Studies

This issue of Sources ambitions to bring together multiple disciplinary perspectives on one or more sound sources produced in Africa. Whether issued from old collections or produced today, audio materials are attracting growing interest in African studies, particularly thanks to the promotion by institutions, researchers, activists and artists of forgotten or difficult-to-access sound and audiovisual collections. Recorded since the late 19th century, these sound objects are extremely diverse: linguistic material, songs and music, field recordings, radio archives, commercial records, film soundtracks, recordings of trials, political speeches, sermons, cassette letters, digital voicemails, etc. Their circulation has increased with the possibilities for duplication offered by cassette technology, and even more so with the digital revolution. Audio recording is also often one of the tools available to social science researchers, and sound objects have become part of the range of objects collected during fieldwork. However, the specificities of the sonic nature of these materials are rarely questioned. Particularly in the case of African and diasporic contexts, it is important to develop methods of listening and analysing that can grasp the multidimensional nature of recordings, the power relations and forms of agency that mark the processes of production, circulation and archiving.

The call is available in English: https://journals.openedition.org/sources/4217

In French: https://journals.openedition.org/sources/4206 

In Portuguese: http://journals.openedition.org/sources/4229 

Proposals should be sent before February 10, 2026 to the following addresses: charlotte.grabli@cnrs.frmbodj@cnrs.frsources@services.cnrs.fr 

Please feel free to share this call for papers in your newsletters, on your websites, and on social media.

Contact Information

Charlotte Grabli, CNRS, Centre d’histoire sociale des mondes contemporains
charlotte.grabli@cnrs.fr

Aïssatou Mbodj-Pouye, CNRS, Institut des mondes africains
mbodj@cnrs.fr

Contact Email
sources@services.cnrs.fr

URL

https://journals.openedition.org/sources/4217

Call for Chapters: Dangerous Writings

Colleagues are invited to submit chapters for an edited collection of Dangerous Writings.

In October 2025, the Dangerous Writings symposium on the Ethics and Practicalities of Working with Risky Texts brought together scholars, archivists, practitioners, and creatives at the University of Manchester to consider the multiple forms of danger embedded in writing, curating, and reading. “Dangerous writings”, for example, include incendiary political texts or memoirs that reveal classified or confidential information, letters from prison and exile, have long served as catalysts for transformation. Yet they are also laden with numerous ethical, emotional, and sometimes legal implications for those who collect them, handle them, and/or encounter them.

This edited collection seeks to develop the conversations initiated at the symposium. At the heart of this endeavour lies a set of questions about power and responsibility. What does it mean to work with writing that unsettles or resists? How do archives, institutions, and researchers navigate the demands of care and risk? And what forms of knowledge or possibility open when we approach these materials with an ethical sensibility?

Contributors are invited to explore dangerous writings in all their complexity, whether through historical, sociological, literary, archival, or practice-based approaches. We are interested in chapters that illuminate how such texts are produced under conditions of constraint; how they challenge authority or institutional narratives; how they demonstrate forms of solidarity and resistance; and how readers, researchers, and custodians negotiate the emotional and professional labour involved in engaging with them.

Works across the social sciences that reflects these tensions are especially welcome. By thinking across disciplinary and institutional boundaries, we hope to advance understanding of what risky writing does and what responsibilities it generates for those who work with it.

Schedule

  • First full chapter drafts (approx. 8,000 words): September 2026
  • Editorial comments returned: November 2026
  • Revised final drafts due: February 2027
  • Proof-ready manuscript submitted to publisher: April 2027
  • Anticipated publication: Summer 2027

Expressions of Interest

Please signal your interest in contributing by emailing Jon Shute (with Emily Turner and Marion Vannier in cc) by Friday, 16 January 2026. At this stage, a brief provisional title and 250 word abstract will suffice.

Call for Case Studies – Artificial Intelligence Applications in Oral History

The forthcoming publication from Palgrave Macmillan, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Oral History: Reports from the Field, is launching a call for case studies from oral history practitioners across the world who have utilized artificial intelligence technologies in their work. The possible applications of this technology will be divided into the following chapters:

Chapter 1 – Artificial Intelligence as Oral History Interviewer

Chapter 2 – Artificial Intelligence as Oral History Transcriber

Chapter 3 – Artificial Intelligence as Oral History Indexer

Chapter 4 – Artificial Intelligence as Oral History Researcher

Chapter 5 – Artificial Intelligence as Oral History Curator

Those interested in submitting their work for potential case study inclusion will identify one of these five areas and summarize their efforts in an abstract of around 250 words, focusing on the application of said technologies, the outcomes of said application, and any lessons learned, or opinions held, in the aftermath. 

Those selected for inclusion will be notified by mid-January 2026 and will then have six months to produce their case study. These documents will range in size from 2500-5000 words depending on the scope of the work and the total number of case studies accepted. The book itself is currently scheduled to be submitted by the end of the Summer 2026 and published in Q1 2027.

The deadline for abstract submission is December 31, 2025. If you are interested in submitting a project for consideration, or if you have any questions about this opportunity, please contact author/editor Steven Sielaff at Steven_Sielaff@baylor.edu.

Contact Information

Steven Sielaff

Contact Email

Steven_Sielaff@baylor.edu