CFP: Engaging with Big and Small Historical Data

The material that historical research – and humanities scholarship in general – is based on traditionally carries names like ‘archival’ or ‘primary sources’. The ongoing disciplinary movement towards digitization and datafication forces us to engage with our material in new ways: it becomes data. The aim of the volume Engaging with Big and Small Historical Data, under contract with Routledge as a part of their Engaging with… series, is to provide a guide for the scholarly community of historians to reflect on the consequences of these current developments. We invite historians and other scholars with an interest in this topic to contribute to the volume. 

The structure of the volume is based on the following question regarding the datafication of historical scholarship. We are specifically looking for scholars interested in contributing to the named chapters within each of these parts of the volume, although we are open to any other suggestions that fit the aims of this volume:

0. Defining Data. The growing abundance of data has long been celebrated under the guise of ‘big data’. The contributions that this volume will start with will together address the most important debates that underlie this rhetoric. They elaborate on the epistemological consequences of thinking in terms of big data, on the rhetoric of ‘newness’ of big data, and on questions of bias, power, and inequality that come with big data.

Available chapters:

  • Historicizing the data deluge
  • Data (and) inequality: power and ethics

1. Where are data to be found? Data is not always stored in the archives and libraries that we know how to work with. Preconditions for access to data are changing. Historians have to cope with paywalls, versioning, permissions, and formats. They have to learn about OCR, image recognition, and other techniques. Most of all, they are usually not in control of what material is or can be turned into data. This raises crucial questions about what material can be worked with as data in the first place, and what material is being left out, excluded, overseen, or forgotten.

Available chapters:

  • Digitization and the role of heritage institutions

2. How do we engage with data? Working with data impacts the epistemological preconditions of historical scholarship, if only because its methodologies usually originate from other fields of research. Does working with data necessitate a (new) quantitative turn in historical scholarship, or can it be integrated into hermeneutic traditions? How do current developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning, which have a huge potential for historical research, impact traditional views on methodological reflection and source criticism?

Available chapters:

  • Becoming interdisciplinary
  • Data and open science: presenting scholarship in the digital age

3. What can we find in data? Tools and techniques for computational analyses of data are advancing with great speed, and historians and other scholars have been using them in a large variety of ways to study history. These techniques allow for new research questions, as well as new perspectives on familiar questions.

Available chapters:

  • Maps
  • Reconstructions

The title of this volume aims to capture the often intertwining trends that are hidden under these questions. It refers to the various dimensions of scholarship that come with digitization and born digital data. In addition, the juxtaposition of big and small also evokes two widely discussed approaches to using data in a humanities context – which are all but mutually exclusive. A more elaborate introduction to the volume’s aims and design can be found at http://tinyurl.com/BigandSmallData

The volume primarily aims to target the field of history. However, even if based on historical examples, the contributions to this volume are to have relevance for other fields of humanities research. After all, the historical data that is being digitized is used in a wide range of fields, from cultural studies to philosophy and from media studies to linguistics. Therefore, scholars from adjacent fields working with historical data are also warmly invited to contribute.

Contributions are ca. 7000 words long (excl. bibliography) and, ideally, relate to a combination of concepts, key terms/methodologies and case studies. Due date for the first draft of contributors’ chapters is Jan 1, 2025. Revised chapters are due in the Spring of 2025. Expected publication of the volume is the Fall of 2025.

Interested scholars are asked to send proposals of max. 300 words no later than July 1, 2024 to volume editor Pim Huijnen at p.huijnen@uu.nl, who you may also contact with any questions. 

Contact Information

Pim Huijnen, Utrecht University

Contact Email

p.huijnen@uu.nl

URL

http://tinyurl.com/BigandSmallData

CFP: Archival Accessioning, special issue of American Archivist

The American Archivist editorial board invites submissions for a special section in American Archivist illuminating the wide-ranging spectrum of archival accessioning practices in the archives field today.

This special section will place dual emphasis on the process and output of the National Best Practices for Archival Accessioning Working Group (ABP), along with broader practical experiences and perspectives from folks actively working to implement a diverse range of accessioning labor throughout the archival lifecycle in different contexts. We strongly encourage submissions that are practical in nature, as well as works that explore contemporary accessioning theory and praxis.

Submissions can explore any of the many operational facets of contemporary archival accessioning, including:

  • pre-custodial engagement, donor relations, radical empathy and candor, and relationship building/maintenance
  • packing and transportation of collection material
  • foundational and/or iterative archival description
  • development of an accessioning program, particularly as it relates to operational impact and sustainable stewardship
  • born-digital accessioning
  • ethical concerns and lived experiences related to accessioning practices
  • physical stabilization, preservation interventions, space usage, and stacks management
  • sustainability and climate impact of accessioning practices
  • appraisal, deaccessioning, and reappraisal
  • management of and advocacy for accessioning labor
  • perspectives on the evolution of archival accessioning; critical analysis of foundational concepts; archival concepts (e.g., provenance, respect des fonds, appraisal) in relation to contemporary accessioning practices
  • post-colonial, post-custodial, reparative, and/or community-centered approaches to accessioning
  • applied theoretical frameworks (e.g., critical race theory, feminist theory)
  • perspectives on archival education and training for accessioning 
  • members of the National Best Practices for Archival Accessioning Working Group (ABP) are particularly encouraged to submit pieces that place the newly developed best practices into real world contexts or that expand upon aspects of the best practices

We seek submissions from authors with a variety of career experiences and diverse perspectives related to archival accessioning practices. The editorial team especially encourages submissions from first-time authors and early-career archives and special collections professionals, as well as from colleagues working in nonprofit organizations; HBCUs, AANAPISIs, and/or HSIs; public libraries; museums; and community archives.

Submissions may take any of the following forms:

  • Research Articles: analytical and critical expositions based on original investigation or on systematic review of literature. (Suggested length: 8,000 words)
  • Case Studies: analytical reports of projects or activities that take place in a specific setting and offer the basis for emulation or comparison in other settings. (Suggested length: 3,000 words)
  • Perspectives: commentaries, reflective or opinion pieces, addressing issues or practices that concern archivists and their constituents. (Suggested length: 2,000-2500 words)
  • Professional Resources: can be annotated bibliographies, other items designed for practical use within the profession, or essays that review the developments (as opposed to the literature) in specified areas in a way that describes particular initiatives and places them in the context of broader trends. (Length varies)

American Archivist is the peer-reviewed, semi-annual journal of the Society of American Archivists. Established in 1938, the journal seeks to reflect thinking about theoretical and practical developments in the archival profession; the relationships between archivists and the creators and users of archives; and cultural, social, legal, and technological developments that affect the nature of recorded information and the need to create and maintain it. 

Submissions will be reviewed by the editorial team, following American Archivist editorial policies. All submissions selected for inclusion in this special section will go through the American Archivist peer review process, the rubric for which can be found here

Inquiries and submissions can be sent to: accessioningspecialsection@gmail.com 

The deadline for submissions is October 1st, 2024.

Editorial Team

Rosemary K. J. Davis
Head, Archival Accessioning
Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library 
Yale University Library

Rachel Searcy
Accessioning Archivist, Archival Collections Management
New York University Libraries

Audra Eagle Yun
Head of Special Collections & Archives
University Archivist
University of California, Irvine Libraries

Call for Proposals/Contributions for Emergent Strategy in Library Instruction: Stories, Reflections, and Imaginings

Call for Proposals/Contributions for Emergent Strategy in Library Instruction: Stories, Reflections, and Imaginings

Working Title: Emergent Strategy in Library Instruction: Stories, Reflections, and Imaginings

Editors: Leah Morin and Hazel McClure

Submission Deadline: June 21, 2024

Publisher: Library Juice Press

Book Description

Have you ever experienced a teaching moment where a subtle shift in attention or a choice to value presence over the plan resulted in an unexpectedly meaningful learning experience? You were likely engaging in emergent strategy, and we invite you to share your story and voice in a new collection, Emergent Strategy in Library Instruction, anticipated in 2026 from Library Juice Press.

Background

adrienne marie brown’s emergent strategy is a feminist, afrofuturist exploration of human relationships, responses to change, and our capacity to dream for more just and beautiful futures. These concepts naturally align with library instruction, allowing students to learn through information and integrate it into new knowledge, understanding, and action.

Principles of Emergent Strategy

The principles of emergent strategy, as outlined in brown’s works, are summarized as follows:

  • Change is constant. Be like water.
  • Small is good, small is all. The large is a reflection of the small.
  • Less prep, more presence.
  • What you pay attention to grows.
  • There is a conversation in the room that only these people in this moment can have. Find it.
  • Move at the speed of trust: focus on critical connection more than critical mass.
  • Trust the people. If you trust them, they become trustworthy.
  • Never a failure, always a lesson.
  • There is always enough time for the right work.

Call for Contributions

We invite submissions of varying lengths, genres, and formats, including but not limited to:

  • Stories
  • Lesson plans
  • Curricula
  • Doodles/Sketches
  • Creative writing (poetry, song, flash fiction)
  • Scholarly writing
  • Interviews/conversations

In all pieces, we encourage authors to demonstrate the connection to emergent strategy and how this approach led to learning.

Submission Guidelines

Please submit your story or idea using the provided form by June 21, 2024. Submissions should be accompanied by a brief abstract outlining the proposed content.

About the Editors

Leah Morin (she/her) is an Information Literacy Librarian at Michigan State University, focusing on first-year writing students. Her research interests include incorporating the feminist ethic of care and emergent strategy concepts into teaching.

Hazel McClure (she/her) serves as the Head of Liberal Arts Programs at Grand Valley State University. Her scholarship explores high-impact practices, information literacy, collaboration with faculty, and teaching information literacy in professional writing contexts.

Contact and Submission

For questions and submissions, please contact the editors via email at editors.emergentstrategy@gmail.com. Submissions can be made using the provided form: Submission Form Link

Call for Proposals: Disability Heritage: Participatory and Transformative Engagement (Key Issues in Heritage Studies, Routledge)

Editors: 

Manon S. Parry, Professor of Medical and Nursing History at VU Amsterdam and Associate Professor of American Studies and Public History at the University of Amsterdam

and

Leni Van Goidsenhoven, Assistant Professor of Critical Disability Studies at the University of Amsterdam and Visiting Professor of Critical Disability Studies at Ghent University

Call for Proposals:

Disability is “everywhere and nowhere” in heritage.[1] Even in settings where disability is obviously embedded, as in collections and sites associated with war, medicine, and industry, the experiences of disabled people often go unacknowledged or uncritically presented in the service of another story. When they are included, their stories have often been pushed to the margins. Framing disabled people in this way, as a small (yet diverse) group separate from mainstream society, ignores the mutual constitution of the categories of disability and able-bodied or neurotypical and neurodivergent, and minimizes the presence and contribution of disabled people throughout history and across society. By reinforcing boundaries between the disabled and the non-disabled, such an approach not only obscures the ways we are connected, but furthermore contributes to disability illegibility in heritage and history, as well as to enduring stigma and ableism.

The inclusion of cultural participation in the 2008 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities generated widespread attention to disability in the heritage sector.[2] The majority of this work has focused on museums, and primarily on accessibility, with a smaller but expanding emphasis on the representation of disabled lives in collections and exhibitions, and among a diversified staff.[3] Yet more radical participatory approaches have the potential to transform heritage at every level, from institutions, people and practices to events, archives, and memories. The proposed volume moves beyond existing work to consider a broader range of cultural contexts, including archives, monuments, (in)tangible cultural heritage such as art and performance, and the built environment, and to address preservation, participation, and engagement rather than the more common focus on heritage consumption. 

Building on existing scholarship and concepts such as “inclusive capital” “archival autonomy,” “disability gain,” and  “crip technoscience,” chapters will critically analyse the benefits and challenges of embedding disability perspectives and examine the impact on heritage, organisations, and career trajectories.[4] The collection will demonstrate the wide relevance of disability history and its traces across all forms of heritage, from archeological, industrial, military, medical, and educational to cultural, digital, and intangible. 

The editors are particularly interested in submissions from disabled authors and co-authored chapters where heritage professionals and artists, activists, and representatives of disability organisations reflect critically on the theme. Scholarly essays, for example analysing heritage concepts or trends, are also welcome. The volume is international in scope and aims for intersectional analyses.

Possible topics include:

-transforming and transformative heritage

-erasure in heritage collections and sites

-at-risk materials, spaces, and histories

-strategies for intervening and challenging misrepresentation

-processes and products of co-creation and community-building

-training, mentoring, and leadership work

-integrating feminist or healthcare perspectives with critical disability studies approaches

-cripping heritage

-embodied heritage engagement

-heritage activism, including interventions, happenings, and protest

-contested heritage/institutional heritage/dark heritage

Timeline:

Chapter proposals due 15 June 2024: 500 words (not including references) 

To be submitted along with a brief biographical statement, via email to m.s.parry@uva.nl and l.vangoidsenhoven@uva.nl with the subject heading “DISABILITY HERITAGE PROPOSAL.” Respondents will be notified of the editors’ decision by 15 July 2024.

First full chapter drafts due 1 December 20246500 words (including references)

Returned withfeedback from the editors by the end of January 2025. Revised chapters will then be due with 2-4 months, depending on the extent of suggested revisions.

[1] Douglas C. Baynton, “Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History,’ in (eds.) Paul K. Longmore and Lauri Umansky, The New Disability History: American Perspectives, (New York: New York University Press, 2001); Research Centre for Museums and Galleries and National Trust, “Everywhere and Nowhere: Guidance for Ethically Researching and Interpreting Disability Histories,” (2023), https://le.ac.uk/rcmg/research-archive/everywhere-and-nowhere.

[2] Neža Šubic & Delia Ferri, “National Disability Strategies as Rights-

Based Cultural Policy Tools, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29:4 (2023), 467-483.

[3] Richard Sandell, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (eds.) Re-Presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum (London/New York: Routledge, 2010).

[4] Simon Hayhoe, Cultural Heritage, Ageing, Disability, and Identity Practice, and the Development of Inclusive Capital (London/New York: Routledge 2019); “Archival autonomy is here defined as the ability for individuals and communities to participate in societal memory, with their own voice, becoming participatory agents in recordkeeping and archiving for identity, memory and accountability purposes.” Joanne Evans, Sue McKemmish, Elizabeth Daniels, and Gavan McCarthy, “Self-determination and Archival Autonomy: Advocating Activism,” Archival Science 15 (2015), 337–368, quoted in Chloe Brownlee-Chapman, Rohhss Chapman, Clarence Eardley, Sara Forster, Victoria Green, Helen Graham, Elizabeth Harkness, Kassie Headon, Pam Humphreys, Nigel Ingham, Sue Ledger, Val May, Andy Minnion, Row Richards, Liz Tilley, Lou Townson, “Between Speaking Out in Public and Being Person-Centred: Collaboratively Designing an Inclusive Archive of Learning Disability History,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24 (8), 889-903; Kelly Fritsch, Aimi Hmaraie, Mara Mills, David Serlin, “Introduction to Special Secion on Crip Technoscience,” in: Catalyst Vol 5:1 (2019).

Contact Information

Prof. dr. Manon S. Parry

Medical and Nursing History, VU Amsterdam

American Studies and Public History, University of Amsterdam

http://www.uva.nl/profiel/p/a/m.s.parry/m.s.parry.html

Mailing Address:

Department of History, European Studies and Religious Studies

University of Amsterdam

PO Box 1610, 1000 BP Amsterdam

Contact Email

m.s.parry@uva.nl

Call for poems, stories, personal essays, and images about archives

For the past year or so, we have been gathering poems, essays, art, and other creative works about archives, archival work, and recordkeeping and posting them to https://imagesofarchives.org.

It is a wide net we have cast but fun and thought-provoking.

We are now looking for others to join us. We seek especially archivists who are poets, storytellers, and essayists; we seek archivists who would be willing to put down on paper their reactions to other writers, within or outside the archives. Submissions will be considered for the website and, ultimately, for a book.

In terms of the images, we encourage those with backgrounds in art history to respond not only with images they select but also to those images chosen by Barbara Craig and James O’Toole in “Looking at Archives in Art” (2000) or those in the recent project of José Luís Bonal and his investigation of the representations of archival documents in art in the National Gallery (UK). Visual images (photographs or artwork showing records, record keepers, or settings) should be submitted as low-resolution copies.

To recap, acceptable submissions may include, but are not limited to:

• Your fiction, poetry, creative nonfiction, or mixed media;

• Personal essays that explore the history, architecture, practices, locations, and representation of archives in the cultural imagination, whether in fiction, poetry, recordings, images, art, or film;

• Images of records and recordkeeping as seen and interpreted by archivists;

• The examination of particular documents or sets of records that move archivists to consider the broader meanings of our profession or the utilization of documents to inspire poetics or literature;

• And finally, other creative work you can suggest pursuing.

Please send submissions, ideas, and queries, by July 1, to:

Susan Tucker and Camille Craig, via visionsofarchives@gmail.com. As we proceed, we will organize a peer review process under other readers.

Best wishes,

Susan Tucker, CA., PhD. (she/her/hers)

Co-editor, The Letters of Josephine Louise Newcomb

504-616-8297

susannah@tulane.edu

and

Camille Craig (she/her/hers)

Graduate Student, LSU School of Information Science

Poet and Aspiring Archivist

ccrai34@lsu.edu

Call for Chapter Proposals: Slow Librarianship: Reflections and Practices

Working Title: Slow Librarianship: Reflections and Practices

Editor: Ashley Rosener

Submission Deadline: August 1, 2024

Publisher: Litwin Books

Chapter submissions are welcome to be published in the forthcoming Slow Librarianship: Reflections and Practices, an edited volume to be published by Litwin Books.

Book Description

Julia Glassman first brought up the term slow librarianship in the 2017 article, “The Innovation Fetish and Slow Librarianship: What Librarians Can Learn from the Juicero.” Since then, Meredith Farkas has defined slow librarianship as “an antiracist, responsive, and values-driven practice that stands in opposition to neoliberal values. Workers in slow libraries are focused on relationship-building, deeply understanding and meeting patron needs, and providing equitable services to their communities.” Slow Librarianship: Reflections and Practices will be an edited book that compiles chapters from different authors, including Meredith Farkas. The focus will be on slow librarianship with a mix of chapters sharing different reflections on what that means as well as chapters on concrete practices and ways librarians are enacting the tenets of slow librarianship in their work while resisting characteristics of white supremacy culture. This book will focus on academic librarianship. The intended audience will be librarians as well as individuals interested in the slow movement. The purpose will be to spread awareness on the newer topic of slow librarianship and compile writings in one book to share how different librarians are approaching, supporting, and enacting slow librarianship.

Topics of Interest for Chapter Contributions Include (but are not limited to)

3-5 chapters that share reflections from different types of academic librarians on how they view slow librarianship and have incorporated it into different types of work (perspectives from library administrator, mid-career librarian, early career librarian, etc.) 

3-5 chapters that share practices and activities different librarians have enacted at their libraries and in their work to support slow librarianship 

2-4 chapters on how slow librarianship can inform our approaches to enhancing diversity in our libraries while supporting inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility efforts in libraries 

1-2 chapters that will address more critical perspectives, such as challenges or tensions within slow librarianship theories and/or practices 

1-2 chapters on what the future of slow librarianship may look like with a call to action and concrete practices anyone can incorporate into their work 

Submission Guidelines

  • Chapters should be between 3,000 to 9,000 words.
  • All submissions must adhere to the Library Juice Press Author Guidelines.
  • Both individual and co-authored pieces are welcome.

Abstract Submission

Submit a 300-500 word abstract outlining your proposed chapter (including a tentative title) by August 1, 2024. 

Important Dates

  • Proposal Submission Deadline: August 1, 2024
  • Acceptance Notification: Sept. 30, 2024
  • Full Chapter Drafts Due: Feb. 1, 2025
  • Review and Revisions Period: Feb. – May 2025
  • Anticipated Publication: Summer 2025

Contact and Submission

Questions and completed proposals should be directed to the editor Ashley Rosener (she/her) at rosenera@gvsu.edu

I encourage you to distribute this call for papers within your professional networks.

The post Call for Chapter Proposals for Slow Librarianship: Reflections and Practices appeared first on Litwin Books & Library Juice Press.

Call for Contributors: SAA Intergenerational Conversation Series

Overview

The goal of this series is to foster ongoing conversation between new voices in the archives profession and authors whose work shaped the professional literature years ago.

The inaugural year of the series focused on the work of archives scholar, practitioner, Society of American Archivists (SAA) Fellow, and former SAA President John Fleckner.

The second year of the series will revisit select SAA Presidential addresses.

Read more.

Call for Abstracts: Close Encounters in War Journal

War has been the object of narration and storytelling since ancient times. Epics, myths, and legends transmitted the memory of heroes’ deeds, thus shaping and consolidating the cultural identities of local communities and ethnic enclaves and later nation-states and empires. Mythical storytelling evolved into historical narration as wars began to be recorded and accounted for systematically by early historians like Herodotus, Thucydides, or in Rome’s Annales. The public narration of war was an effective instrument of political and ideological cohesion as it displayed power and fueled patriotic sentiments. However, the narration of war remained confined to the domain of public discourse despite armies consisting of individuals who contributed to the war directly and with personal sacrifice. The first personal account of war in the Western cultural tradition is Odysseus’s tale of the fall of Troy, which he shares with the Phaeaces. Thucydides referred to singular episodes involving specific individuals in his narration of the Peloponnesian Wars, though his discourse excludes any form of direct and personal narration. The first case of an extensive autobiographical war narrative is Julius Caesar’s De bello gallico. Despite being narrated in the third person, this work provides an individual-centred perspective about the military campaigns led by Caesar between 58 and 50 BC, culminating with the conquest of Gallia and Britannia. For the first time, the historian, the storyteller, and the protagonist of the tale coexist in the figure of the anonymous narrator/chronicler who accounts for Caesar’s deeds in the third person.

Personal narratives about war have seldom reached the public before the nineteenth century. This caused scholars to believe that anonymous soldiers, who constituted the core of all armies in any historical period, never wrote about their experiences. Writing, on the other hand, was a skill far from being achieved by everyone in the pre-modern era. Only a few combatants could account for their war experiences in writing, for example, through letters, diaries and memoirs, a small number of which has reached the public as books. Furthermore, while personal accounts of war mostly remained confined to military, political, and intelligence communication – and are therefore stored in archives and mostly accessible as historical sources – the first testimonies of war that became works of public interest did not appear in the form of autobiographies or memoirs. An author like Tobias Smollett transfigured his war experiences as a navy surgeon in his novel The Adventures of Roderick Random (1748). Something similar did Herman Melville in White Jacket (1850), an autobiographical work inspired by the author’s experience as a sailor on the frigate USS United States. In general, it can be stated that the Napoleonic wars (1800-1815) triggered an incredible proliferation of autobiographical personal accounts since the 1820s.[1] This is not surprising, if one thinks that modern autobiography – as a genre and as a philosophical form of reflection on the “self” – begins in the seventeenth century with Rousseau’s Confessions (1782),[2] whose “revolution” transformed the subject into a “unique and unrepeatable psychical interiority, which was accessible only through introspective writing.”[3]

If the nineteenth century was characterised by an increasing interest in war personal narratives, the phenomenon assumed a mass scale with the outbreak of the Great War, mainly for two reasons: the enormous mass of soldiers involved in the conflict on a global scale for over four years; and the diffusion of literacy among the mass of enlisted soldiers. Scholars claim that between 1914 and 1918, over 65 billion letters circulated between the frontlines and Italy, France, Germany, and Great Britain.[4] If personal narratives from the nineteenth-century wars amount to hundreds, above all distributed in Western countries, autobiographical accounts of the Great War amount to many thousands, spread all over the world. New groups of authors appear in this recent tradition, such as prisoners of war (POWs), women, and members of colonial troops. One striking phenomenon that characterised the response of some combatants to the Great War was the blooming of poetry in all countries, with remarkable achievements in the UK with the so-called “war poets” Wilfred Owen, Rupert Brooke, and Siegfried Sassoon, in Austria with Georg Trakl, and in Italy with the Futurists, Gabriele D’annunzio, and Giuseppe Ungaretti, only to mention a few examples. Moreover, the technological nature of the war caused all armies to create specialised corps such as pilots, tankers, submarine crews, drivers, and chemical companies, whose members published several personal narratives that enlightened the aspects of the “new” warfare. During and after the Second World War, further groups of witnesses appeared, such as the victims of political and racial persecution and deportation and the members of armed resistance (partisans) against the Nazi and the Fascist authorities in several European countries.

As wars became more and more global, during the twentieth century, so did the more and more established genre of war narratives, which eventually became a consistent section of contemporary literature (despite the debate that saw literary scholars question the literariness of personal narratives), or at least of the international book market. One can recall several personal narratives that have become classics of twentieth-century literature like Henri Barbusse’s Le feu (1916), Ernst Jünger’s In Stahlgewittern (1920), Thomas Edward Lawrence’s Seven Pillars of Wisdom (1926), Anne Frank’s Diary (1947), Primo Levi’s Se questo è un uomo (1958), Elie Wiesel’s La Nuit (1958), Elechi Amadi’s Sunset in Biafra (1973), Eugene Sledge’s, With the Old Breed (1981), Eric Lomax’ The Railway Man (1995), Isaac Fadoyebo’s A Stroke of Unbelievable Luck (1999), Keiko Tamura’s Michi’s Memoirs (2001), and many more worldwide.

As a genre, personal narratives have evolved over two centuries, passing from being almost exclusively memoirs written by high-ranking officers (mostly noble) to consisting of a much more multifaceted variety of expressive forms including letters, diaries, autobiographical sketches, poems, published or unpublished memoirs, oral histories and autobiographical fiction. After a long-lasting prejudice that banned personal narratives from the history of war and conflict, which was relegated to the disciplinary field of Military History, since the 1960s historians have begun to look at these narrations as valid and valuable sources of historical knowledge, thus giving impulse, after the so-called “cultural” and “narrative” turns after the 1970s, to the birth of sub-disciplines such as Micro-History, History of Mentality, Cultural History, Oral History and more recently the History of the Emotions. Working with personal narratives is a challenging scholarly enterprise due to the flickering and multifaceted nature of this kind of written expression, which is transversal to literary genres while including forms, styles, and registers typical of the spoken language. Personal narratives can hardly provide an overall comprehension and depiction of war, as they can inform about events that occurred on a smaller scale and the perception that human beings have of the war as a direct experience. Therefore, working with personal narratives often requires intellectual flexibility and the ability to blend different disciplinary approaches by borrowing diverse methodological, critical and analytical tools.

Issue n. 7 of the CEIWJ aims to investigate the theme of the close encounters in war in connection with the universe of personal narratives to study how people have accounted for their personal experience of war in ancient, pre-modern, modern and contemporary periods. To do so, we invite the submission of articles focused on the investigation of testimonies from a broad spectrum of theoretical and critical perspectives in the fields of Aesthetics, Anthropology, Classics, Comparative Literature, Cultural History, Ethics, Epistemology, Ethnology, Gender Studies, History of Art, History of Ideas, Linguistics, Memory Studies, Modern Languages, Oral History, Philosophy of Language, Psychology, Religion, Social Sciences, and Trauma Studies.

We invite, per the scientific purpose of the journal, contributions that focus on human dimensions and perspectives on this topic. We, therefore, seek articles that analyse the close encounters in war in diaries, letters, autobiographies, memoirs, autobiographical fiction, oral histories and other egodocuments such as juridical testimonies and memoirs, bulletins and reports (military, medical, technical, and so on), photographic albums, drawings and paintings. The following aspects (among others) may be considered:

  • Representation and perception of the “self” in the context of war;
  • Language, public and private (e.g. the use of dialect or foreign languages; encrypted writing; metaphors, symbols and allegories; alternative forms of communication);
  • Propaganda and ideology (e.g. political perspectives; racism; nationalism; religious fanaticism);
  • Ethical and moral aspects (e.g. personal development; self-understanding; the relation with the others; justification of violence; acceptance of suffering and death);
  • Censorship and self-censorship in personal narratives;
  • Literary aspects of personal narratives (e.g. use of literary models and styles; editorial re-elaboration of personal narratives for publication; the relationship between fiction and autobiographical writing; personal narrative and the literary canon);
  • Personal narratives as historical sources (e.g. methodological and deontological  issues; epistemological value of personal narratives; rhetoric and logic);
  • Anti-war attitudes (e.g. pacifism; criticism of violence; desertion and conscience objection; sabotage);
  • Feelings and emotions in personal narratives;
  • Personal narratives and trauma;
  • Identity and diversity (e.g. gender; ethnicity; cultural heritage);
  • Personal narratives in pop culture (e.g. film; TV; journalism; cultural heritage);
  • Personal narratives and the culture of memory (local and collective) (e.g. archives and repositories; Public History; sites of memory; public use of personal narratives through the Internet);

CEIWJ encourages inter/multidisciplinary approaches and dialogue among different scientific fields to promote discussion and scholarly research. The blending of different approaches will be warmly welcomed. Contributions from established scholars, early-career researchers, doctoral students, witnesses of war (e.g. veterans, journalists, reporters, etc.) and practitioners who have dealt with or used personal narratives in the course of their activities will be considered. Case studies may include different historical periods and geographic areas.

The editors of the Close Encounters in War Journal invite the submission of abstracts of 250 words in English by 31 March 2024 to ceiwj@nutorevelli.org. The authors invited to submit their works will be required to send articles of 8,000-10,000 words (endnotes included, bibliographical references not included in word count), in English by 14 June 2024. All articles will undergo a process of double-blind peer review. We will notify the results of the review in September 2024. Final versions of revised articles will be submitted in November 2024. Please see the submission guidelines at: https://closeencountersinwar.org/instruction-for-authors-submissions/.

[1]     See, for example, http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/browse?type=lcsubc&key=Napoleonic%20Wars%2C%201800%2D1815%20%2D%2D%20Personal%20narratives%2C%20French (Napoleonic wars 1800-1815), http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book//browse?type=lcsubc&key=Crimean%20War%2C%201853%2D1856%20%2D%2D%20Personal%20narratives (Crimean war 1853-1856), and https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/166546.First_hand_accounts_of_the_Napoleonic_Wars. See also the repository of personal narratives from the American Civil War of the University of Maryland at https://lib.guides.umd.edu/c.php?g=326774&p=2197450 (all websites last accessed on 11th January 2024).

[2]     James Goodwin, in “Narcissus and Autobiography”, Genre, 12, 1 (1979): 69-92; Andrea Battistini, Lo specchio di Dedalo. Autobiografia e biografia, Bologna, il Mulino, 103-104.

[3]     Gianluca Cinelli, Ermeneutica e scrittura autobiografica. Primo Levi, Nuto Revelli, Rosetta Loy, Mario Rigoni Stern, Milan, Unicopli, 2008, 12.

[4]     Carlo Stiaccini, War Letters (Italy), in International Encyclopedia of the First World War (8 January 2017): 2. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_letters_italy.

Contact Information

Gianluca Cinelli giancin77@yahoo.it

Patrizia Piredda patrizia.piredda@oxfordalumni.org

Simona Tobia s.tobia@univ-pau.fr

Fabio Caffarena fabio.caffarena@unige.it

Contact Email

ceiwj@nutorevelli.org

URL

https://closeencountersinwar.org/2024/01/17/call-for-articles-for-issue-n-7-202…

Call for Pitches: Contingent (online history magazine)

Dear All:

I am serving as a guest editor for Contingent, a non-profit, online history magazine established a few years ago. We just opened for pitches, and I thought you all might be interested in submitting material culture history-related content. We pay our contributors (starting base pay ranges from $50-$250 depending on the type and length of contribution), and you can learn more about the genres of writing for which we accept pitches here: https://contingentmagazine.org/pitch-us/  The pitch process is explained at more length here: https://contingentmagazine.org/how-to-pitch-us/ There are research genres, but we also accept pitches for museum reviews and “field trips” to your workplace. There are lots of fun possibilities for featuring your work!

I’m new to the editorial team but am happy to answer (or find an answer to) any questions you have.

Thanks, and please feel free to share.
Nicole

Nicole Belolan, PhD
she/her/hers

Contact Information

Nicole Belolan, PhD
she/her/hers
nicole@nicolebelolanconsultingllc.com
Nicole Belolan Consulting
Accessible and Sustainable History and Humanities Consulting
Web: https://nicolebelolanconsultingllc.com/

Call for Submissions to 2024 ALA LHRT Research Forum: Trouble, Trouble, Trouble 

The Library History Round Table (LHRT) of the American Library Association (ALA) seeks proposals for its annual Research Forum, to be held in advance of the 2024 ALA Annual Meeting. 

To accommodate as many LHRT members as possible, the 2024 LHRT Research Forum will be held virtually on a date to be determined in early-to-mid June 2024.

 The theme of the Forum is “Trouble, Trouble, Trouble.” The Forum will examine libraries facing internal or external crises around the globe and across centuries. Each speaker will be asked to present for approximately 20 minutes, with a 10-minute Q&A to follow.

Possible topics may include, but are not limited to, histories of: 

  • Censorship, book banning, book burning
  • Libraries during wars and wartime conditions
  • Institutional financial difficulties and funding issues
  • Natural disasters and their impact on libraries and services
  • Survival and loss of libraries and staff
  • Disinformation and the spread of disinformation 

LHRT welcomes submissions from researchers of all backgrounds, including library students, practitioners, faculty, independent researchers, and those retired from the field. LHRT especially encourages submissions from early-career researchers.  

Each proposal must give the paper title, an abstract (up to 500 words), and the presenter’s one-page vita. Please indicate in the abstract whether the research is in-progress or completed. 

The LHRT Research Committee will select up to three authors to present their completed work at the Forum. Proposals are due January 31; successful proposals will be notified shortly thereafter. Completed papers are due May 31

Please submit proposals and direct inquiries to Alea Henle, LHRT Vice Chair/Research Committee Chair, at henlear@miamioh.edu

Research Committee Members: 

Alea Henle 
Jennifer Bartlett 
Catherine Minter 
Deborah Smith
Leah DiCiesare