New Issue: Information & Culture

Information & Culture
Volume 51, Issue 2, Spring 2016

ARTICLES

A Framework for Understanding Information Ecosystems in Firms and Industries
James W. Cortada

A Cowman’s-Eye View of the Information Ecology of the Texas Cattle Industry from the Civil War to World War I
David B. Gracy II
The Value Proposition of the Corporate Library, Past and Present
Alistair Black and Henry Gabb
Generations of Business Information, 1937–2012: Moving from Data Bits to Intelligence
Andrew Gross and Emeric Solymossy
Technology in Architectural Practice: Transforming Work with Information, 1960s–1990s
Katie Pierce Meyer
The Literature of American Library History, 2012–2013
Edward A. Goedeken

http://utpress.utexas.edu/index.php/journals/information-culture

Sheila Scoville
Journals Promotion Coordinator
University of Texas Press

CFP: Journal of Western Archives

The most notable web archiving effort to date (Internet Archive) started in California in 1996. Twenty years later, archival institutions throughout the Western United States are engaged in the curation and preservation of web content.

To better explore this rapidly evolving domain of the archival frontier, the Journal of Western Archives (http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/) is currently seeking submissions for an upcoming special issue focused entirely on web archiving.

Potential topics include but are not limited to:

* Application of new tools and workflows
* Calls to action or imagined futures
* Collaborative collections or projects
* Implementation of new programs or policies
* Lessons from advocacy or outreach
* (Local but likely shared) challenges, and solutions
* Quality assurance approaches and insights
* (Web) archival theory and practice

Acceptable formats for submission include final or work-in-progress research articles or case studies, as well as reviews of books, collections, services, or other media substantively concerning web archiving.

Potential contributors are encouraged to consult the more general submission guidelines. (http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/styleguide.html). Begin the submission process by creating a contributor account (http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/useradd.cgi?context=westernarchives).

The submission deadline for this special issue on web archiving is August 15, 2016.

Please contact JWA editor J. Gordon Daines III/gordon_daines@byu.edu or guest editor Nicholas Taylor/ntay@stanford.edu if you have any questions.

Journal of Western Archives is an open source and peer-reviewed journal that provides a venue where archivists working in the American West can highlight their unique contributions to the archival profession. See the journal overview (http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/about.html) for complete coverage of the journal’s scope and aims.

_________________________
J. Gordon Daines III
Supervisor of Reference Services
Department Chair
L. Tom Perry Special Collections
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
801-422-5821
gordon_daines@byu.edu

CFP: Provenance

Provenance: The Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists, a peer reviewed academic publication, seeks articles on archival theory and practice for the 2016 issue. Please note that the content of the journal is not limited to the state of Georgia, and articles of regional or national significance are welcome. First-time authors are especially encouraged to submit articles for consideration. As evidenced by the forthcoming audiovisual issue, composed of video, audio, and traditional article formats, Provenance is also interested in innovative and unique methods for presenting scholarly content.

Articles on archival topics outside of theory and practice which meet publication standards will also be considered. Typical papers should be a Word document, 10-20 pages, double spaced, and formatted according to the 16th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style. Please review information for contributors: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/policies.html. Articles are to be submitted utilizing Provenance’s online system: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/.

For additional information contact Editor Heather Oswald at: provenance@soga.org. Deadline for contributions is July 31, 2016.

Gracy Award 

Each year the SGA awards the Gracy Award, a $350 prize which recognizes a superior contribution to Provenance. Named for David B. Gracy II, founder and first editor of Georgia Archive, the award began in 1990 and is judged by the editorial board.

*Back issues of Provenance and Georgia Archive available online*

At nearly 50,000 hits/downloads, the back issues (1972-2015) are a great
resource for archivists: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/

————–

The 2015 print issue is on its way to subscribers now, and will be publicly available online following a year long embargo for membership benefit. Become a member today!

Table of Contents for the 2015 issue:

2015 Society of Georgia Archivists Annual Meeting Keynote Address
Only Connect: Communities, Archives and the Making and Keeping of Memory
Jeannette A. Bastian

Articles

 A Push in the Right Direction: Expanding Models of Mentorship
Lynette Stoudt, Caitlin Birch, Michelle Chiles, Luciana Spracher, Darla White

Time, Money and Effort: A Practical Approach to Digital Content Management
Christine S. Wiseman, Alfred S. Matthews

Our Love Won’t Fade Away: Processing the Jerry Garcia Memorial Altar Collection
Scott J. Carlson

Archivists and Faculty Collaborative Course Development
Courtney Chartier, Gabrielle M. Dudley, Donna Troka

The Right to Know … Or Not: The Freedom of Information Act, 1955-1974
Tommy C. Brown

Hoarding and Its Effects on Acquisition and Appraisal: Two Case Studies from the University of Illinois Archives
Roxanne M. Dunn

The Case of Stanly Will
Ryan Speer

Reviews

Gorman, Our Enduring Values Revisited: Librarianship in an Ever-Changing World
Reviewed by Debra Branson March

Santamaria, Extensible Processing for Archives and Special Collections: Reducing Processing Backlogs
Reviewed by Michael Nagy

Caldera and Neal, Through the Archival Looking Glass: A Reader on Diversity and Inclusion
Reviewed by Laura Starratt

Behrnd-Klodt and Prom, eds. Rights in the Digital Era
Reviewed by Mandy Mastrovita

Delve and Anderson, Preserving Complex Digital Objects
Reviewed by Carol Waggoner-Angleton

Corrado and Moulaison, Digital Preservation for Libraries, Archives, and Museums
Reviewed by Grant Maher

Eichhorn, The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order
Reviewed by Cheryl Oestreicher

Cloonon, Preserving Our Heritage: Perspectives from Antiquity to the Digital Age
Reviewed by Michael Law

Theimer, ed., Educational Programs: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections
Reviewed by Pamela Nye

Pénichon, Twentieth-Century Color Photographs: Identification and Care
Reviewed by Mandi D. Johnson

Bradley, Social Media for Creative Libraries
Reviewed by Amanda Pellerin

Heather Oswald

Editor, Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists

CFP: Records Management Journal

Records Management Journal – Themed issue call for papers

Fresh Insights: Student Research in Records Management

Editor: Fiorella Foscarini, University of Amsterdam

Guest Editor: Donald Force, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The Records Management Journal invites submissions for a themed issue dedicated to emerging scholars who are engaged in original research broadly related to the area of records and information management.  Students enrolled in undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate programs at the time of the issuing of this call are invited to submit papers based on course assignments, projects, theses, or other kinds of research work carried out as part of their education.

We welcome contributions about, but not limited to, the following themes:

  • Concepts of record, document, information, archives
  • Recordkeeping theories, methods, and practices
  • History of recordkeeping
  • Professional roles and skills
  • Recordkeeping systems, technologies, and infrastructures
  • Digital preservation and access
  • User perspectives
  • Organizational culture
  • Personal recordkeeping
  • Studies of textual and non-textual documents
  • Contemporary perspectives on records, information, and archives

Students at all stages of their study who have done some research on issues that may be of interest to the Records Management Journal are invited to submit an extended abstract according to the instructions mentioned below.

Submission Deadlines:

  • Extended abstracts (more info below): 1 May 2016
  • Abstracts accepted and authors notified no later than: 30 May 2016
  • Full paper submitted: 1 October 2016
  • Review, revision and final acceptance: 28 February 2017

Submission Process:

Extended abstracts should be a 500-word version of the Records Management Journal?s structured abstract, using the headings described in the author guidelines (http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=rmj). Under the design/methodology/approach heading, please include the following as appropriate to the type of paper:

  • (If it is a theoretical or conceptual paper) what is the approach to the topic? Briefly outline existing knowledge and the value added by the paper compared to that.
  • (If it is a research paper) what is the main research question or aim? What are the research strategy and the main method(s) used?
  • (If the paper is a case study) outline its scope and nature and the method of deriving conclusions.

Please send your extended abstract to the Journal Editor Fiorella Foscarini: f.foscarini@uva.nl

Full papers (for accepted abstracts) should be 3000-7000 words (excluding references) and should be prepared using the RMJ guidelines, which can be read here: http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=rmj. Papers will be reviewed following the journal?s standard double-blind peer review process.

Fiorella Foscarini (f.foscarini@uva.nl<mailto:f.foscarini@uva.nl>) is also happy to receive informal enquiries.

—————————-

Donald C. Force, PhD

Assistant Professor
School of Information Studies
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Office: NWQ 3495
Phone: (414) 229-2792

AASLH’s “Interpreting LGBT History” Wins 2016 NCPH Book Award

Read more on the AASLH blog: http://blogs.aaslh.org/aaslhs-interpreting-lgbt-history-wins-2016-ncph-book-award/.

Purchase the book: https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780759123724.

“Interpreting History” Series: https://rowman.com/Action/SERIES/RL/RLINTERP/Museum-Studies-Interpreting-History.

Help SAA Shape Future Publications

The SAA Publications Board needs you! Take this 10-minute survey about your book reading preferences and help shape the future of book publishing at SAA. Submit your responses today (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/saabooks), and enter your name in the drawing to win a new iPad with complimentary digital access to three SAA books.

As a former member of the Publications Board, I know your voice is important. Publishing is changing and evolving, and knowing how both members and non-members would like to access is important to the development of SAA publishing. Please share your opinion!

Forced Writing: On the Tenure-track

Most of us became archivists because we love history, organizing, libraries, and “old stuff.” Though we had to write during library school, many of us did not plan on writing more than finding aids. However, many academic librarians and archivists are expected to publish as one aspect of receiving tenure. It is stressful when your job is contingent on fulfilling this obligation.

If writing isn’t a passion, forced publishing is definitely a challenge. At my institution, obtaining tenure has requirements related to librarianship, publishing/creative works, and service. When I started, I was one year out of finishing my PhD. Obtaining that degree made me much better prepared for the publishing requirement and for that I am grateful. Library schools may emphasize writing, but it’s more of a requirement for that degree than to pursue publishing.

It is stressful for many tenure-track archivists to publish. As noted previously, I’ve had many discussions with people who wonder if they have anything to say (see here and here). There is a time requirement to go up for tenure, therefore a time requirement to publish articles or book chapters. On the one hand, it forces you to be proactive in deciding what to write about, as Eira Tansey wrote. On the other hand, it can be an incredible amount of pressure.

I’m not well-versed in tenure requirements across all academic institutions, but I will generalize that many require publishing peer-review articles. Having one or more articles evaluated by professional peers is much more rigorous, therefore has more weight, than publishing newsletter articles, blog posts, or other informal writings. Writing a book has merit as well, but as we have fewer book publishing options than other academic disciplines, that is harder to accomplish (plus it takes a lot longer).

Having gone through the tenure process and as a supervisor to library faculty, here’s what I can offer:

  • Pick a journal first. Find one that aligns with your interests and passions. Read a few of the recent articles, browse past issues to see topics, etc. Contact the editor to ask if your idea would be of interest. And read the information for authors. While we all may aspire to write for The American Archivist, it’s highly competitive and you might be better off starting with another journal.
  • Don’t want to write about archives practices? Depending on your institution’s requirements, consider publishing in non-archives journals. Try library or other academic disciplinary journals. Do archival research on a topic of interest. (Blatant self-promotion, I used the archival research I did for my dissertation to publish in Reception: Texts, Readers, Audiences, History)
  • Start with an idea. You don’t have to have an exact argument to start writing. Once you research and write out your thoughts, it will evolve and become focused. Interested in digital forensics? privacy and confidentiality? outreach? Have you read an article or book that you strongly disagree with or you think could be improved or reacted to? Read a few books and articles to see what’s been said, what you agree/disagree with, then write.
  • Find colleagues with similar interests to see about co-authorship.
  • Start with a library school paper or presentation and expand it.
  • Write about something that interests you. It’s hard to be disciplined about writing when you have little or no interest in the subject.
  • Write about a project you completed, an initiative you started, or your experience with any aspect of archives. While theory is important, many archivists are interested in others’ practices that they can implement or adapt.
  • Write, write, write.
  • Start earlier rather than later. It can take 1-2 years to publish an article, taking into account the writing, peer-review, editing, and final publication. There’s no guarantee of acceptance, and you may have to submit, resubmit, or rewrite more than one article or for more than one journal. (Yes, an article I wrote with colleagues was rejected)
  • Create goals, timelines, outlines, number of pages to write a day/week, place to write, music to listen to, number of diet cokes to drink, and so forth. When you accomplish your set goals (say, weekly), reward yourself.
  • Make writing a priority and be disciplined. Carve out time daily/weekly (whatever works for you) to keep momentum and progress.
  • Write, write, write.
  • Take it a little at a time. Thinking about the entire article can be overwhelming, so focus on a section. Before you know it, you’ll have the whole article written.
  • Find support, whether at your institution, other colleagues, a writing group, or friends. Talking to people about your ideas or having others read your writing can go a long way to stay motivated.
  • Write, write, write.
  • Allow yourself to gripe and complain. Then let it go and keep writing.
  • Don’t try to make an article perfect. Be coherent, concise, grammatically correct (or at least mostly), and cite your sources. But remember that editors and reviewers will always have feedback, suggestions, and grammatical corrections.
  • Write one article at a time.
  • Don’t be overambitious. For example, if you are interested in doing a survey but don’t have experience in qualitative/quantitative analysis, it could be difficult to take on such a project.
  • Write, write, write.

 

 

Call: SAA Research Forum

I have yet to attend SAA’s Research Forum, though I’m always intrigued by it. If you’ve presented or attended, please share your experience in the comments.

Here is the information: http://www2.archivists.org/proceedings/research-forum/2016/call.

They also share everything from past Forums, including posters, research reports, and peer-review research papers: http://archivists.org/proceedings/research-forum.

New Book: Latinos in Libraries, Museums, and Archives

From the Rowman and Littlefield website:

Latinos in Libraries, Museums, and Archives: Cultural Competence in Action! An Asset-Based Approach
Patricia Montiel-Overall; Annabelle Villaescusa Nuñez, Verónica Reyes Escudero

Written by three experienced LIS professionals, Latinos in Libraries, Museums, and Archives demonstrates the meaning of cultural competence in the everyday work in libraries, archives, museums, and special collections with Latino populations. The authors focus on their areas of expertise including academic, school, public libraries, health sciences, archives, and special collections to show the importance of understanding how cultural competence effects the day-to-day communication, relationship building, and information provision with Latinos. They acknowledge the role of both tacit and explicit knowledge in their work, and discuss ways in which cultural competence is integral to successful delivery of services to, communication with, and relationship building with Latino communities.

 

CFP: Journal of the International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives

reposted from A&A listserv:

Reminder: Call for Papers: Journal of the International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives, Issue no. 46

Important Dates
March 7, 2016: Expression of interest deadline (this is a new extended date)
March 15, 2016: Full article submission deadline
April 30, 2016: Journal release

Editor: Bertram Lyons (editor@iasa-web.org)

General Call for Papers
IASA Journal invites proposals covering general topics of interest to the sound and audiovisual archives communities throughout the world. Articles, reviews, essays, and technical documents are welcome.

Issue no. 46 special considerations:

We encourage submissions that respond to critical issues for audiovisual archives today:
* Degradation in legacy physical collections, especially magnetic carriers
* Obsolescence of playback equipment and strategies for acquiring spare parts for playback machines
* Selecting sustainable and compatible target codecs and wrappers for A-to-D video reformatting projects
* The proliferation of born-digital audiovisual formats and codecs
* Planning for the necessary technical infrastructure needed to ingest and manage the large digital collections being created and acquired at sound and audiovisual archives worldwide
* Intellectual property rights
* Metadata strategies for time-based media objects
* Providing meaningful and useful access to sound and audiovisual collections for researchers of all kinds and in all locations

Please consider submitting an article covering one of these topics or the results of independent research that would be of interest to the IASA membership.

Abstracts (maximum 250 words each) may be in French, German, Spanish, or English. Images can be sent as digital images in GIF, JPEG, PDF, PNG,
or TIFF formats.

Please send expressions of interest no later than March 4, 2016, via email to the editor: editor@iasa-web.org.

Information for authors

1. Once accepted, final articles must be submitted to the editor by March 15, 2016.
2. Soft copy as a .doc file for text should be submitted with minimal formatting.
3. Illustrations (photographs, diagrams, tables, maps, etc) may be submitted as low resolution files placed in the .doc file AND high-resolution versions for publication must also be sent separately as attachments.
4. Use footnotes not endnotes.
5. References should be listed at the end of the article in alphabetic order and chronologically for each author and should adhere to the guidelines of the Chicago Manual of
 Style (http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html).
6. Authors are encouraged to submit original research or to develop their conference 
presentations into more detailed accounts and/or arguments for publication in the journal. In principle, articles should be no longer than 5,000 words.

Information for advertisers

Enquiries about advertising should be sent to the Editor (editor@iasa-web.org). Current rates can be seen on the website at http://www.iasa-web.org/iasa-journal-advertising.

Please contact editor@iasa-web.org with any questions.

Thanks, and best —

Bertram Lyons, Editor, IASA Journal

_________________

Bertram Lyons, CA
AVPreserve | www.avpreserve.com